Blog Watch Edition 6: The Revenge Of The Nerds That Isn’t

Dedicated to the winners … and the losers. Details after the jump.

Rap Music Is Good Now Because Rappers Aren’t Afraid To Be Weird: Bry correctly notes that “Proclamations that a certain era is ‘good’ or ‘bad’ for music are always specious,” but then casually (perhaps smugly) dismisses his own honest analysis to get on with the business of reporting on a phenomenon that was invented for the sake of writing the article. Disappointingly, he proclaims that “objectively speaking, this, right now, is a really good time for rap music,” as if he wishes to be admired for making irreparably contradictory claims within the same article. Bry does not explain how he came to conclude that rap music went from being less than good to good as a result of rappers shedding their supposed fears of being weird; the title of the article suggests that it must be so, and Bry attempts, against all logic including his own, to conjure a reality that reflects his core assumptions.

The objectivity that is promised is quickly stamped out by a parade of  unsupported claims of causality — all of which are saddled by problematic undefined terms — written in the safely vague language of county fair palm readers: “Kanye’s album probably has something to do with [this being a ‘really good time for rap music’]. It was a work of great artistic ambition, and the fact that it succeeded as it did was bound to have a positive effect.” Not only are we supposed to accept Bry’s assumption that rap progressed from a vaguely “bad time” to a vaguely “good time” characterized by — gasp! can it be? — “artistic ambition,” we must also accept that a few randomly selected harbingers of forward-thinking eccentricity  have effected this change and vanquished an unnamed army of philistines. This process is not described in detail but its success is noted as an undoubtedly “positive” development. Confused yet?

The article becomes more confounding with each paragraph. Bry cites a short post by grandgood’s g that is so vague it could mean just about anything — or almost nothing at all, more likely ((I think g has proven himself capable of cogent analysis in the past, but that particular quote is not an example of that, and if I had to guess probably wasn’t meant to be read as anything other than a brain fart.)) — to argue that  artists such as Jay Electronica and the Odd Future collective represent a sea change in the willingness of listeners to embrace “weird” music. At this point, “weird” is so broadly defined as to be rendered virtually meaningless, so the reader must accept that the “deep thinking” Jay Electronica and the “defiant” members of Odd Future possess some kind of mystic, unnameable commonality beyond being rappers. (( Bry treads rather lightly when championing defiant weirdness, though, echoing so many mediocre bloggers by warning readers that Earl Sweatshirt’s “Earl” video has “lots of blood and gore. I find some of it extremely unpleasant to watch. You may want to close your eyes.” The revolution won’t be televised?))

Bry very nearly stumbles into interesting territory when he points out Lil B’s tendency to refer to himself as a “nerd” and a “faggot” despite identifying as heterosexual. But since engaging in analysis deeper than noting that “Lil B is nothing if not interesting” would do little and perhaps nothing to strengthen the already tenuous connection between Lil B and the other artists mentioned — thereby calling into question the necessity of the article — he drops the topic as fast as it was introduced. ((For a much richer analysis of the topics of masculinity and sexuality in hip hop, read “On the Looming Crisis of Masculinity in Hip Hop…and why it’s a good thing”; Lil B’s flouting of rap norms will make considerably more sense when analyzed against this article.)) Bry observes that Lil B has collaborated with the G-Unit’s Tony Yayo, but rather than interpreting the collaboration as a sign of a surprising open-mindedness on the part of Yayo as one expects, he uses this otherwise unremarkable fact to launch into a denunciation of the whole rap genre (pre-Weird Revolution of 2010).

The charges? Well, according to Bry “Rap is one of the most conservative forms of popular music going” because “rap artists break codes of dress, behavior and subject matter at the peril of their commercial viability.” It isn’t clear which form of modern conservatism that rap clings to; clarifying this point would most likely cause the supposed connection between the “weird” rappers mentioned in this article to disintegrate. ((Citing Christopher Weingarten’s poorly presented case that Lil Wayne either fathered or predicted — he isn’t sure which — Tyler The Creator’s style doesn’t help matters.)) To accept these claims as true we must also assume that artists from other genres regularly break codes of conduct without imperiling their viability in a declining market. Bry offers no evidence of non-rap artists acting in such a manner without consequences, but he does offer numerous examples of rappers like Tony Yayo doing so without damaging their careers, so the reader is left to wonder what the fuss is all about.

Bry offers wanton speculation to account for his irrational concern, wondering whether Prodigy’s subliminal dis of Keith Murray’s “crazy space shit that doesn’t even make no sense” or Big Boi’s partership with Andre 3000 might have stifled budding eccentricity. He takes rap music (pre-Weird Revolution of 2011) so literally and is so reluctant to attribute any sense of irony or complexity to rappers that it does not occur to him that the borders he has drawn between “weird” and “conservative” practices have been blurred and ruptured for nearly as long as the genre has existed. ((Another point that is very much worth noting, and was in fact brought up in the comments section of Bry’s article, is that rap culture has often informed from the bottom up, not vice-versa. Meaning that is is entirely possibly that the issues impacting the genre’s core fan base — young black and brown men — often find their way into the music and its attendant discourse. Given the wealth of writings, from authors and scholars as prolific as Chauncey De Vega and T. Coates, that document the experience of being black and gifted, or black and nerdy, or a ghetto nerd, or an upwardly mobile ex-thug in academia, or what have you, it might have behooved Bry to consider that his treatment of these issues as a crisis within rap music was a bit myopic, and to consider a new approach.))

When has it ever been truly clear who were the nerds and who were the jocks? ((In this post David of So Many Shrimp notes quite astutely that the type of rappers who were also hip hop aficianados (as opposed to say, straight up hustlers who moved on to rap) straddled the line between cool and outcast: “in high school I remember nerding out on rap often seemed to appeal to dudes who felt like outsiders, like it was for dudes who had alpha personalities but through accident of birth were short or weird or too nonathletic to be jocks.” )) De La Soul punched out thuggish hecklers calling them “fags” on their first tour; Keith Murray confronted and whipped the shit out of Prodigy in retaliation for the skit; Big Boi and Andre have dedicated entire songs and at least one album to the topic of the group’s generative duality; and Biz Markie was more successful than LL Cool J at ingratiating himself with the drug dealing clientele of The Rooftop ((Source: “Chucky Smash From The Legion: The Unkut Interview.”)). Rap never needed or desired to be saved from the supposed evils of masculine competitive mockery; ((There is no greater proof of the enduring appeal of such expressions than the popularity of Odd Future.)) even those rappers that were bold enough to declare the dawn of a new day were adamant about respecting the existing balance. — Thun

Tags: , , ,


9 Responses to “Blog Watch Edition 6: The Revenge Of The Nerds That Isn’t”

  1. done says:

    weird once again as soon as i read that post i new you were gonna do one of these. great work man, its like you read my mind, made it 10 times more articulate and added a ton of insights never would have occoured to me.

    i found speakerboxx to be a lot more experimental than the love below, unhappy, rooster, flip flop rock, ghetto music, knowing were all on some forward-looking shit, whereas andre for the most part wasnt doing anything particularly novel or original, he was just doing what non-rap people had being doing forever, mixing elements of rap music into other genres. its like they still think its the sixties and fusing genres is groundbreaking instead of using the precedents the genre itself set to judge progression. with that said i loved love below for what it was, just didnt think it was mind-blowing or anything

    this dude needs to listen to more bay area rap if he thinks weirdness on this scale is a new development in rap. or redefine what he considers weird. hes looking for all these non-rap signifiers of weirdness or just plain superficial ones like yayo collabing with lil b. and big definitive statements like this – “Rap is one of the most conservative forms of popular music going. ” is just lazy as fuck.

  2. done says:

    and i cant remember who said it, but yeah this dude needs to stop writing about rap. hes like the new tom breihan and even tom was a much better writer. theyr probably equal in their understanding of rap music tho

    • Thun says:

      I don’t know if he needs to stop writing; that’s ultimately on him. I just don’t care much for the ideas he presented in this article, nor the self-righteous, outsider-corrective tone that was used to convey those ideas.

      • done says:

        well yeh, i was just fuckin around but actually it would be nice if he presented these posts more as short opinion peices, his toned be less problematic then.

  3. Droopy says:

    Yea, it seemed as though he listed more exceptions to his point than actual data to support his assertions.

  4. […] Blog Watch Edition 6: The Revenge Of The Nerds That Isn’t by Thun […]

  5. Jamey says:

    I have to show some thanks to this writer for rescuing me from this type of condition. Right after researching throughout the search engines and getting views which were not pleasant, I believed my life was done. Being alive minus the strategies to the issues you’ve fixed as a result of your main report is a critical case, and ones that could have in a wrong way affected my entire career if I had not noticed your website. Your main understanding and kindness in dealing with a lot of things was valuable. I don’t know what I would’ve done if I had not come across such a thing like this. It’s possible to at this moment relish my future. Thanks a lot very much for the reliable and results-oriented guide. I won’t hesitate to refer your site to any person who needs guide about this subject matter.

  6. Hello, what do you really feel with regards to omega xl for arthritis? Really fascinating idea, huh?

  7. Your means of telling all in this post is genuinely pleasant, all can without difficulty be aware of it, Thanks a lot.|

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *